Mar
14th

INS Viraat: India’s Air Craft Carrier

Read more articles:

Files under Miscellaneous


25 Responses to “INS Viraat: India’s Air Craft Carrier”

  1. By blinky123abc on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    Indian propaganda is LOL!

  2. By m60a3ttsmilwaukee on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    thankyou so much for posting!…glorious victory to india!…with all the falklands-uk news I grew very nostalgic longing to see the glorious legendary hms hermes of the falklands war of 1982 and sea harrier frs-1…just the most beautiful warship in the world!/ @ milwaukee

  3. By pogularocky on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    lol… yeah… u r right… that is y Mrs. Clinton lost to Mr. Obama.

    Ciao!

  4. By pogularocky on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    So do submarines sink and planes crash.

    What is your point?

  5. By pogularocky on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    That is very interesting… coming from an American… lol

  6. By gregrutz on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    Total domination leads to total War.

  7. By gregrutz on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    You are right, a ”White” woman, is smarter than any ”darky”.

  8. By pogularocky on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    We have less than 1% “White” population. So, my argument does hold stronger than yours. :)

  9. By pogularocky on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    India developed Ship-to-Air anti-missile technology in 2009. Tests were successful. Live sea tests are due this year before induction. They claim that it is the answer to the Chinese anti-ship missiles. Let’s see how that goes.

  10. By pogularocky on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    The carrier is already in Arabian sea patrolling the Pakistani sea routes as a deterrent. It is not for sailing close to their shores. Just to cut off their oil & other import supplies in case of a war. Total naval domination of that region is essential for our safety.

  11. By gregrutz on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    You going to sail to Pakistan and fight them. LOL

  12. By gregrutz on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    Blacks are only 10% of the US population.
    Your argument sucks.

  13. By pogularocky on Mar 14, 2010 | Reply

    A white dominated country took 233 years to elect a person of color into the “White” house.

    Mostly colored India elected an Italian “White” woman to the Prime Minister’s office back in 2004.

    We have a mere residual caste system in India which has no bearings on the lives of majority of the population anymore. The so called untouchables wrote our constitution, were our prime ministers & presidents several times, enjoy education & job reservations. They are like the native americans in US.

  14. By gregrutz on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    We don’t use cow shit to clean our houses. We don’t drink piss.
    You had a civil war and gave 2 countries to the muslims, who are going to nuke you.

  15. By gregrutz on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    The Nigros were free in 1865, we now have one as president.
    You have a cast system, untouchables !

  16. By pogularocky on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    So, compared to that shit, India is way better off :)

    Take just one example. You guys got independence in 1776 and it was not until the 1960s that Blacks got out of segregation and slavery. Until now you guys did not even have a woman president. Until 1930s you did not let women vote. What a backward and slow society you live in.

    We got independence in 1947. Our constitution gave equal rights to our women right away. We had elected women prime ministers and Presidents.

  17. By pogularocky on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    lol… typical uneducated american teenager.

    u must be either in army reserve or paramilitary, give ur brainwashed & narrow minded outlook of other nations.

    India has been free for only 62 years. Let’s see what year America celebrated it’s 62nd independence anniversary… that would put it at 1838.

    WOW! That puts America hardly 16 years into their industrial revolution. Hardly a developed nation by any stretch.

    It was a poor, but slowly developing nation, riddled with slavery & civil wars.

  18. By gregrutz on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    Carriers sink.

  19. By gregrutz on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    @chhabraamit
    No, you are a third world coutry because you have no infrastucture and a lot of poor people. People in rich countries live on paved roads and own cars and mow their lawns.

  20. By chhabraamit on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    Hi Cyqed,

    Have you ever tried finding out why india is called a third world country…well from your knowledge it seems like you have never…anyway i will explain it to you. Well because we were liberated after second world war…so it’s not due to politicians being hungry for money….so this tag is not going to go anywhere…and its not because of what india is or its politicians are…

  21. By ViraatKasliwal on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    ummm yes i agree with u, but i think though china do not have an aircraft carrier they still have a more powerful navy than ours. but yes we do rank in the top 7 in the world(argubally 6th) also we’re not only buying the ghorshkov from russia but also building our own indigenous carrier at cochin which should be ready by 2015.

  22. By typhoonq on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    desertfalcon, I am afriad India Aircraft carrier will become a large moving target for the latest Chinese Super Anti-ship missiles.
    Even the US Navy has conceited that at the moment they have nothing to counter such threat.
    Please view ” China anti-ship missiles capabilty” as reported by US Defence community.

  23. By desertfalcon on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    @FlingwingGolfer It is an ex-British, not Russian carrier. India is fitting out an ex-Russian carrier as well, however, which is even bigger and more potant. India’s navy is now one of the most powerful and professionally trained in the world ranking just after the American & French navies and the Royal Navy of the UK.

  24. By malay132 on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    hi mrs raja sir we want more video on army

  25. By FlingwingGolfer on Mar 15, 2010 | Reply

    India deserves acknowledgment for even HAVING an aircraft carrier (buying it from Russia, by the looks of it), but to be a dominant power in the international arena, your aircraft carrier should not be your only one. It should be just another tool, not an exclusive display of power. Judge it by the affect the sinking of this carrier will have on your total strike abilities if engaged in a war.

Post a Comment